JEWRY'S "LINGUISTIC TERRORISM" AGAINST BECK
By Rev. Ted Pike
1 Feb 11
For more than 60 years, Christian and conservative leaders have
dutifully accepted Jewish dogma that the Nazis were the historical
apex of evil; they accept that the Holocaust exterminated six million
Jews and has no parallel in human history. The political right obediently
fails to mention that Jewish supremacists inspired and abetted international
communism, slaughtering 100 million-plus Christians and Gentiles.
(See, Jewish
Activists Created Communism) Instead,
they parrot that Nazi atrocities are the standard against which all
lesser evils are measured. Such cooperation by Christians has been
accepted by Jews as their due, as a race which has suffered (primarily
at the hands of Christians) more than any other.
Today, Jewish leadership is changing the rules to demand even greater
obeisance.
In 2009, after Israel’s horrific siege of Gaza, political cartoonists
widely depicted Israeli leadership and military as similar to Nazism.
Israel’s PR rep, the Anti-Defamation League, struck back against
such critics through its Office of Global Anti-Semitism in the US State
Department. The State Dept. agreed that any comparison of Israeli brutality
to Nazism or the “Holocaust” is now “anti-Semitic”—a
virtual hate crime. (See, Jewish
Activist Heads State Department's Office of Global Anti-Semitism)
ADL then began to express even more objections to unauthorized use
of Nazi terminology. It is increasingly clear that ADL/world Jewry
now claim virtual copyright on such terms. These are words,
ADL asserts, which are bound to the unique and sacred suffering of
Jews. ADL even teaches it insults the real Holocaust when
pro-lifers dare to compare it to the killing of hundreds of millions
of unborn babies worldwide. (forward.com “Huckabee’s ‘Holocaust’ Analogy
Has ADL Angry” 10.31.07; adl.org “New
York State Senator Should Apologize for His Remarks Comparing Abortion
to the Holocaust” 3.18.05;
adl.org “Letters
to the Editor” 3.17.06 )
Rabbis
Wants to Hijack Language
Last week, 400 US rabbis, spanning all branches of Judaism from Reconstructionism
to Orthodoxy, sent a letter to Fox News demanding that talk show host
Glenn Beck be censured. They were irate that he denigrated Holocaust
survivor George Soros and has used Jewish-owned terms, such as "Nazi" and "Holocaust," to
attack his enemies. The rabbis assert such terms are so enmeshed in
Jewish suffering that, when employed to criticize anything less than
the magnitude of the Holocaust, such references
become not only insulting to the Jewish people but border on actual
anti-Semitism.
What used to be right-wing obedience to Jewish desire to vilify Nazis
as much as possible is now used against the right - being irrationally
portrayed by Jewish leaders as “disrespect
of the Jewish dead," a sacrilege. For Beck's insult of using the
word “holocaust” inappropriately, and his unfortunate misrepresentation
of the youth of Soros, a Holocaust survivor, the rabbis proclaim Beck’s
words “monstrous” and “beyond repugnant” in
their “anti-Semitic imagery.” (Washington
Post.com “Glenn
Beck vs. the Rabbis” 1.28.11)
Similar howls and claims of Jewish hurt feelings erupted a week earlier
when Sarah Palin described attacks upon her as “blood libel.” Jewish
leaders clearly believe “blood libel” is again intellectual
Jewish property, a phrase to be used only with Jewish permission and
to describe medieval Christian persecution of Jews. To do otherwise,
they assert, is perilously close to complicity with those who have
actually persecuted Jews throughout history.
Obviously, liberal Jewish leadership is, at the very least, hostile
to the religious right. Worse, it is straining to bring about the decline
and persecution of those who project Christian values into the political
forum. Unable to legitimately accuse loyal Christian followers of Israel,
they attempt the next best thing: an illusion that the religious
right is abrasive and insensitive to Jewish feelings and past sufferings.
Such insensitivity, Jewish supremacists claim, reveals an inclination
toward Jew-hatred. Thus, the right is a seedbed for renewed persecution
of Jews.
Beck's lack of initial comment only increases public perception that
he can't answer his Jewish accusers.
These 400 spiritual leaders of American Judaism are indulging in sinister
and manipulative rumor-mongering. Beck, Palin and virtually all major
leaders of the religious right are utterly obedient to Jewish/Holocaust/anti-Nazi
values. Yet, by turning their very anti-Nazi zeal against them, liberal
Jewry hopes to create as many evangelical offenders as possible. They
want to blacken the right as anti-Semitic and violence-engendering,
worthy of legislation drastically curbing its freedoms.
ADL and SPLC hoped last month that some substantial link would tie
Jared Loughner to right-wing or, even better, anti-Zionist organizations.
They were disappointed. But these Jewish attack groups are confident
that eventually a terrorist assassin (or even an “agent
provocateur”) will erupt in violence, armed with generous
connections to conservatism. When that happens, liberal Jewry and its
big media will consider their present irrational efforts to
link Beck and Palin with anti-Semitism to have been a sound propaganda
offensive, a vital first step toward outright persecution.
(See, Jews
Confirm Big Media Is Jewish)
What Can We Do?
We must not tolerate Jewish attempts to take possession of important,
highly descriptive words of the English language. Words and their definitions
have tremendous potency for good or evil, empowering enormous movements
of history.
In the 1960s, pornography and burning of the flag were made into “free
speech.” Abortionists,
unable to rationally promote their case for killing the unborn, marketed
their gruesome industry as “a woman’s right to choose.” Soon
after, sodomy was called “the gay lifestyle.” Now, ADL’s
Department of Global Anti-Semitism in the US State Department defines “anti-Semitism” as
the New Testament assertion that Jews had Christ killed.
(See,
The
Real Motive Behind the "Department of Global Anti-Semitism")
It is vital that lovers of freedom continue using all of
the English language freely in political discourse—even in denunciation.
If we stop using certain words because Jewish manipulators claim they
are “deeply hurt” by such “uncivil” usage,
then we empower these supremacists to demand even more censorship.
Eventually, with only “inoffensive” speech allowed and “hate
speech” not tolerated, we will discover we no longer have a working,
protective First Amendment. We will no longer have a language capable
of condemning evil.
We will no longer have freedom.
