HAGEE: ENFORCE UN THOUGHT CRIMES LAW!
By Rev. Ted Pike
7 Oct 10
Pastor John Hagee is a fanatically “Israel-first” evangelical
who leads his troops in unconditional moral and financial support of
the Jewish state. Today he is “supporting” Israel by endorsing
laws that were created to destroy people just like him—Christians.
Hagee is calling for a United Nations indictment of Iranian President
Ahmadinejad for the “thought crime” of inciting genocide.
petition has gathered 133,000 signatures. Along with Jewish activists
Elie Wiesel and Sen. Joe Lieberman, Hagee says the Iranian leader’s
attempts to “dehumanize Israelis and demonize Jews” are
illegal under the UN’s 1948 Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Most Americans know nothing of this UN Convention or its
latent threat to empower international persecution of free thinkers!
If they knew the truth, one certainly hopes they wouldn’t sign
The Convention is primarily the invention of Polish-Jewish
international law expert Rafael Lemkin. It was promoted by Marxist
globalists and the Jewish Anti-Defamation League as an early attempt
at an internationally enforced thought crimes law. It was ratified
by the UN decades before ADL/B’nai B’rith introduced national
and state hate laws to most of the western world. The Convention has
been accepted by virtually all nations. Although the 1945 Connally
Reservation restricts prosecution of Americans by it in a world court,
it was foolishly passed by Congress and signed into law as a treaty
by President Reagan in 1988.
Its crucial “thought crimes” section defines genocide
as “…any of the following acts committed with intent to
destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious
group, as such…(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to
members of the group.” (Article 2) Thus the Convention gives
every racial or religious group the right to claim mental harm as a
result of others’ "intentions" to destroy them. Such
groups can claim victimhood and initiate international prosecution.
The Convention is a highly dangerous hate crimes law.
Hidden Agenda behind the Convention
Most sane people can accept a law forbidding the actual massacre of
members of a race or religion. Yet the Convention isn’t
limited to physical acts of violence. That legal simplicity wouldn’t
take society where Jewish supremacists want us to go. Their agenda
means criminalizing thoughts and emotions themselves—making "bias" itself
Lemkin actually coined the term “genocide” to describe
a bias-motivated crime of epic proportions. Today we are told by ADL
that genocide is caused by prejudice against racial/religious groups.
Such bias is the fundamental cause of history’s worst crimes.
And where does most bias come from? ADL answers: “Christian intolerance.” Thus
Christianity—and its biased, hateful and hurtful judgments—must
With this in mind, the Convention criminalizes actions which
are not genocidal, such as "causing mental harm!" Lemkin’s
broad and ambiguous definition of genocide makes it much easier to
level the charge. “Human rights tribunals” must form to
investigate and pontificate upon the intent of the accused. The result
(as in ADL hate law countries today) is legal anarchy. No one is sure
what "hate speech" is or whether a person’s motives
can be sufficiently defended, especially if they have caused "emotional
harm" by criticizing protected groups.
When Does a Crime Occur?
Under traditional Western jurisprudence, a crime occurs when a physical action
violates established law. God alone can judge our intentions. Human
law must limit prosecution to what is physically demonstrable. But
under thought crime laws, a crime happens when a governing entity says
a forbidden intention or emotion has occurred! Thought crime laws thus
give “thought police” the power to define and prosecute
what they deem to be hate speech. They minimize or omit centuries-old
legal standards as well as the real human rights and protections
that go with them.
The Convention is identical in legal theory to the entrapping
hate laws ADL/B’nai B’rith laid on Canada in 1971. The
Canadian Human Rights Act says that if anyone has the bias
motivation (intention) of criticizing members of federally protected
groups (homosexuals, Jews, Muslims, etc.) and does so, causing them
mental anguish, then the victim can bring a hate crimes charge against
his verbal assailant. He will almost certainly be upheld and the “hater” receives
a minimum $5,000 fine—and imprisonment if such “hate speech” continues.
Hagee, flanked by far left Jewish activists, now claims that Ahmadinejad
intends to not only cause the state of Israel and Jewish people “serious
mental harm,” but also to annihilate them. He says the world
should have executed Hitler when his early words revealed his intention;
then six million Jews would not have died. The same should be true
Should Iran’s leader be indicted under international law for
his “intentions” and the emotional distress he brings Jews?
133,000 signatories, mostly evangelicals, say “Yes!” Such
Christians should know they are putting their freedom and that of their
children in extreme danger by such a stand. Most Christians and conservatives
oppose any restrictions on free speech in their own countries; yet
on the international scene, they eagerly join Zionist mouthpieces like
Jay Sekulow, Hal Lindsey, and Hagee in censoring free speech. They
demand Ahmadinejad be denied an international forum, especially at
the UN. In joining the ADL/Zionist forces of censorship and boycott,
evangelicals encourage international speech crime enforcement.
The monster these evangelicals are creating will someday turn on them.
When that happens, these very evangelicals will themselves be silenced.
What Hagee and his Zionist handlers recommend should be laughable
in a free western world. But even more absurd and incredible Zionist
initiatives are now a grim reality. Scholars who question the six million
figure of Holocaust dead are outlawed, deported and imprisoned—with
cooperation of most nations, including the US.
When ADL/B’nai B’rith helped Lemkin craft their Convention in
1948, his freedom-destroying scheme was far ahead of its time. Yet
today, their dream of a federal hate crimes law in the US has come
true. The next step toward world hate law enforcement is undoubtedly
to resurrect the Genocide Convention. International law professor
A. Schabas approvingly says “…it sits four-square
within the priorities of both the United Nations and the modern human
rights movement, aimed at the eradication of racism and xenophobia.”
Since its ratification in 1948, the Convention has been
criticized by conservatives as so ambiguous and potentially threatening
that international political opportunists might someday use it to indict
their adversaries. That fear is realized today. Hagee/Israel claim
that they know Ahmadinejad intends to destroy Jews in Israel and that
his threatening words cause fear and “mental harm” to Israelis;
thus he is guilty of at least inciting genocide.
Conservatives at this time should limit development of international
speech crimes enforcement, not encourage it. Although the US and many
nations were reluctant to support international enforcement of the Convention,
it was still enshrined in international law. Like other “sleeper” hate
laws, awaiting their ominous moment in history, it could soon empower
prosecution of politically incorrect individuals and nations. An essential
step toward world government is increased participation of many groups—including
Christians and Jews—to demand international hate crime enforcement.
Perhaps John Hagee is the evangelical Judas-goat chosen to lead that
ominous march into the dark.